Why did the Big Three disagree so much during the peace discussions of 1919?
They each sought to protect their own national interests
Lloyd George – the British Empire and trade
This included allowing Germany to recover economically at least
Whilst he would also want Germany to act as a counter-balance to French power as well as a bulwark against Bolshevism
Clemenceau sought to ensure French security which meant a much-weakened Germany
And to make Germany pay for the damage it had caused France and its people
This meant inflicting a harsh punishment on Germany: taking territory, heavy reparations, a much-weakened military
Wilson wanted a peaceful world to get back to trading as soon as possible because this would only make America wealthier
He also wanted to prevent America having to come between warring factions in Europe again
Lloyd George didn’t want Germany punished so much that it would seek
revenge
The French demands were simply to extreme, for example separating the
Rhineland from Germany
Whilst he was uneasy about Wilson’s 14 Points, eg free access to the seas and self-determination, at least when it came to the British Empire. He was also concerned that a League of Nations might involve Britain in conflicts around the world
Wilson didn’t want to punish Germany so harsh that it would seek revenge either
Wilson believed in the moral basis of his 14 Points, particularly democracy and self-determination
Clemenceau as well as wanting to ensure France was safe also wanted revenge
It could be said that both Lloyd George and Wilson, whilst not forgetting what had happened, were also trying to look to the future; whereas Clemenceau could only look back